From Kevin McGran of the Toronto Star:

The dispute boils down transition rules between successive collective bargaining agreements, including the interpretation of the 2005 CBA’s definition of a “free agent” contrasted with Frogren’s status as a “defected” player under the previous CBA. “Defected status” was his official listing, resulting from the fact he had been drafted by the Calgary Flames in 1998, but never came to the NHL.

“It comes down to a question of interpretation,” said a source close to the deal. “The CBA is relatively new and things haven’t happened before where they’ve had to deal with it.”This is one of those instances where they’ve never had a 28-year-old free agent signing his first contract. There’s an interpretation issue.”

Read the entire article here.

Considering Frogren was drafted by the Flames way back in 1998, I would tend to think he should not be limited to an entry level contract.

Richard Pollock

Share
Published by
Richard Pollock

Recent Posts

Blackhawks welcome back video for Jonathan Toews & United Center standing ovation

A huge welcome back for number 19 after he spent 15 seasons in the Windy…

4 hours ago

Former Blackhawks captain Jonathan Toews returns to Chicago for first media availability as visiting player

In his first season as a member of the Jets he will play his first…

12 hours ago

Game 48: Winnipeg Jets vs Chicago Blackhawks pre-game report

A look at the projected lineups and pre-game interviews.

16 hours ago

Winnipeg Jets Morning Papers: Today’s Hockey Headlines | Jan 19, 2026

A daily roundup of Winnipeg Jets, Manitoba Moose coverage — all the pro hockey news…

19 hours ago

Winnipeg Jets Morning Papers: Today’s Hockey Headlines | Jan 18, 2026

A daily roundup of Winnipeg Jets, Manitoba Moose coverage — all the pro hockey news…

2 days ago