Brooks: “And if the Rangers commit now to Jagr at some cost to Drury and Gomez, then doesn’t last summer’s call not to give Nylander the deal that would have kept him on Broadway appear terribly misguided?”
Here is the link to the full NY Post article.
My take: Brooks tackles the Jagr issue from a number of different angles. That, of course, makes for an interesting read; however, he does not address who would take Jagr’s place should the Rangers let him go. Never mind the fact that Jagr was far and away the Rangers’ best player during their two round playoff stint. I think it would be foolish for the Rangers to let Jagr go.
