Brooks: “And if the Rangers commit now to Jagr at some cost to Drury and Gomez, then doesn’t last summer’s call not to give Nylander the deal that would have kept him on Broadway appear terribly misguided?”

Here is the link to the full NY Post article.

My take: Brooks tackles the Jagr issue from a number of different angles. That, of course, makes for an interesting read; however, he does not address who would take Jagr’s place should the Rangers let him go. Never mind the fact that Jagr was far and away the Rangers’ best player during their two round playoff stint. I think it would be foolish for the Rangers to let Jagr go.

Richard Pollock

Share
Published by
Richard Pollock

Recent Posts

Winnipeg Jets Practice Report

Latest from practice on the NHL club of Winnipeg.

15 hours ago

Winnipeg Jets’ Kyle Connor featured in entertaining KFC collab

Who knew the Michigan product had acting skills.

18 hours ago

Winnipeg Jets Morning Papers: Today’s Hockey Headlines | Mar 30, 2026

A daily roundup of Jets, Moose coverage — all the pro hockey news that matters…

21 hours ago

Winnipeg Jets Morning Papers: Today’s Hockey Headlines | Mar 29, 2026

A daily roundup of Jets, Moose coverage — all the pro hockey news that matters…

2 days ago