Comments on: News (6/7) you can use: Latest on Return of the NHL to Winnipeg

By: M Remis

M Remis — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:39:00 +0000

Would be interesting to see if the team wasn’t called Jets, if fans will still chant Go Jets Go as they have been doing since Brunt’s article

By: Luke Miguez

Luke Miguez — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:32:00 +0000

I figure if anything is dampening the Stanley Cup Final at the moment it’d be the ridiculous 2 day breaks.

By: Luke Miguez

Luke Miguez — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 21:30:00 +0000

Quebec City’s prospective ownership group has already said that they’d go with the ‘Nordiques’. Not much of a debate!

By: Jamie Coran

Jamie Coran — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:00:00 +0000

I agree. We won’t ever go back to the 80′s when even grinders got 70 points. NHL is what it is, but the playoffs are always gts.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:35:00 +0000

Contraction to improve the game? The game is absolutely unbelievable right now! The playoffs have been bar-none the most exciting in years and years, maybe ever? The Canadiens run last year, Philly’s miracle comeback, the Chicago/Vancouver series 3 years straight. Maybe the regular season isn’t as ‘exciting’ as it used to be but when it matters, in the playoffs, the excitement, competitiveness and overall gameplay has been superb and you cannot deny this. Forget contraction, just lose the teams that don’t make any money!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:12:00 +0000

I sure hope youre right, and at the same time, i cant see how you could be wrong. Is it too soon to start a name debate for Quebec City?

By: Larry Plett

Larry Plett — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:10:00 +0000

The tidal wave of support continues to swell in favour of the Jets name. Can’t see TNSE going against popular opinion.

They can totally re-design it but people want Jets.

By: Larry Plett

Larry Plett — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 17:09:00 +0000

Cox is exactly what his last name suggests……

By: Luke Miguez

Luke Miguez — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:52:00 +0000

If they name the team the ‘Falcons’ people are still going to chant Go Jets Go at the games regardless. True North would be definitely swimming upstream on this issue, and it sucks away most of their momentum from the season ticket drive.

By: Phillip Smithson

Phillip Smithson — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:51:00 +0000

If Glendale decides that it is not going to support the Coyotes anymore and no one wants to keep the team there the NHL will put the team up for sale to anyone who can buy it. Is there anywhere in Quebec they could put up a team while they fast track the completion of building? The old Colisee?

Name? Sorry for beating the drum of the majority. But I’m a supporter of the Jets name. I think the old name re-imagined is just fine. The mob gets what they want and TNSE gets their marketing exposure.

Next. Regardless of the team name. Do we get a new petition fired up requesting the return of the Winnipeg banners from the Coyotes? I say yes.

Last, how many season tickets are going to become available because no shows up to claim their seats. I hope all those scalpers out there who were never going to a game anyway lose all their deposits and their chance at making cash on the true fans in Winnipeg.

Sorry for the long post but I’m on my way to work and had a lot to say!

By: Luke Miguez

Luke Miguez — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:49:00 +0000

Can’t go with anything else other than the Jets.

On the relocation/contraction front. I figure that the Phoenix Coyotes will relocate to Quebec City, potentially as early as next summer.

By: Mike Fraser

Mike Fraser — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:30:00 +0000

Right now owners and the NHL have dollar signs in their eyes. With Winnipeg instantly becoming number six in revenue, one of the struggling teams will be put on the fast track to Quebec. Of course at the top of the list is Phoenix. Contraction is not an option especially with Canada presenting itself as a goldmine for the NHL.
Look to see the NHL suddenly drop all heroic efforts to keep the Coyotes in Phoenix, and suddenly get very cozy with Quebec. Thats my prediction.

By: Ryan Moharid

Ryan Moharid — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:26:00 +0000

Falcons. I know everyone wants Go Jets Go, but c’mon people you can still chant “Let’s Go Falcons”.

By: Ryan Moharid

Ryan Moharid — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:25:00 +0000

Good points. My guess is NHL waits for QC to build arena then moves Phoenix.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:22:00 +0000

Thats actually one of the more logical points ive heard in a while. I never thought of it that way, but its absolutely true. You should write a rant/article on this Drew!

By: Drew Mindell

Drew Mindell — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:03:00 +0000

On the heels of the Nathan Horton decapitation attempt from last night, the truth is that if the NHL wants to do away with hits like that, contraction is the way to go about it. Better players, more skilled players, mean the head shots wont occur as often, simply because the players who typically resort to those actions won’t be in the NHL. Less players=more skill=less goonery

By: Jen Massley

Jen Massley — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:57:00 +0000

So torn on the naming issue. Love the Jets but like the Falcons name and possible logo. How accurate is the one above?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:55:00 +0000

Aww, my last comment disappeared. But yes, i know contraction will never happen until i am commissioner, or maybe Drew as well, but in my mind, in this era of the NHL, i dont see many other options. Of all the cities we regularly talk about, which ones have the combination of a ready to go arena, and will owners with deep pockets to support lean years?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:48:00 +0000

Trust me, i fully understand that we will not see contraction until i am commissioner, or Drew it appears…but for now, it seems the only logical solution in my mind…..

By: Michael Remis

Michael Remis — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:41:00 +0000

I agree with Dave, it’ll never happen. The players won’t allow it because they will lose jobs and the owners will lose revenues. Might as well move it to places that will support it (Quebec City/Hamilton/Toronto)

By: Illegal Curve

Illegal Curve — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:39:00 +0000

By: Matt Hink

Matt Hink — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:39:00 +0000

With Damien Cox at the helm, negativity is the name of the game. His goal in being a journalist has long appeared to be simply to annoy people.

By: illegalcurvedave

illegalcurvedave — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:24:00 +0000

Never going to happen guys. NHL won’t contract. Now moving teams to where they will get better support isn’t such a bad thing.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:21:00 +0000

Oh i could write on contraction for hours, bc i completely agree with you. Enough of this watered down talent, and at times, poor hockey, just to appear to be competing with other major North American sports, in terms of number of cities represented. I want good quality hockey, in cities where it is supported all the time, not just during win streaks. I’m in the mind that 22-24 teams is plenty right now, until they are able to ‘grow the sport’ as Bettman says, on a larger scale down south.

By: Drew Mindell

Drew Mindell — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:13:00 +0000

I am voting for contraction. Nothing personal, but there truly aren’t enough “real” NHL players to account for 30 teams. Lets contract 6 of the struggling franchises (or so) and get back to the quality of hockey we were used to seeing in the late 1980′s, early 1990′s…..hmmm, maybe it’s time to write an article/rant along these lines.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:59:00 +0000

On the topic of relocation, once again, what the heck is the NHL going to do over the next season if the Coyotes continue to languish in the desert? Let’s be honest, they are at risk of losing one of their top 3 assets in Bryzgalov, and they will not be the team they have been the past 2 seasons. Its been proven over the past 17 years that if the talent and the wins disappear, so do the fans. But what truly are the NHLs options? Quebec, owners, but no arena. Kansas City, arena, but no owners. Is it possible we will see an announcement of a 2-3 year lame duck period in Phoenix to get an arena thrown up in Quebec city?

By: Drew Mindell

Drew Mindell — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:46:00 +0000

I was stressing out waiting for this to be posted this AM!

By: King of the Movers

King of the Movers — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:45:00 +0000

“Toronto Star: Winnipeg’s house cleaning leaves lingering questions” It seems a Toronto paper responsible for one miserable, negative article per day…