http://illegalcurve.com/2009/07/03/2010-stanley-cup-odds/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=2010-stanley-cup-odds The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes. Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:42:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://illegalcurve.com/2009/07/03/2010-stanley-cup-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-2409 Ari Sat, 04 Jul 2009 14:13:09 +0000 http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=15105#comment-2409 I don’t understand your comment. They know who most of the players on each team will be. For example, you would think Detroit has a better chance at winning the Cup than the Islanders so you would expect the odds would be lower for Detroit.

]]> http://illegalcurve.com/2009/07/03/2010-stanley-cup-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-2406 TheMetalChick Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:35:39 +0000 http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=15105#comment-2406 How the hell can they already have odds when you dont even know who the hell is going to be on each team three friggin months from now? Talk about stupid.

]]> http://illegalcurve.com/2009/07/03/2010-stanley-cup-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-2405 Ari Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:02:13 +0000 http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=15105#comment-2405 Yeah, the Flyers are definitely better, but +1600 may be a fair assessment of their chances WITH Pronger. Also they are +1800 at Bet365. Calgary improves, so does Montreal. If I had one bet to make I would probably take the Habs at +3500.

]]> http://illegalcurve.com/2009/07/03/2010-stanley-cup-odds/comment-page-1/#comment-2404 Richard Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:01:56 +0000 http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=15105#comment-2404 Flyers add Pronger and their odds don’t change. Seems like interesting odds to me.

]]>