<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detroit Red Wings &#8211; Anaheim Ducks 2nd Round Playoff Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview</link>
	<description>The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like the real Red Wings have finally arrived at the party.  Took them long enough.  With Getzlaf only playing 2:43 in the 3rd and Hiller looking human its not looking good for the Ducks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the real Red Wings have finally arrived at the party.  Took them long enough.  With Getzlaf only playing 2:43 in the 3rd and Hiller looking human its not looking good for the Ducks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 17:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read Rich&#039;s article. I read all the IC articles and all the comments. Doesn&#039;t everyone?

But what about Boston&#039;s win after a longer layoff than the Wings vs a team that must have had THE ultimate high winning with two goals in the last two minutes in the seventh game on the road against Martin Brodeur?

So far 100% of teams who had long layoffs after the first round have won the first game of the next vs teams that didn&#039;t.

You were right. Detroit got the only stat that matters. &quot;W&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read Rich&#8217;s article. I read all the IC articles and all the comments. Doesn&#8217;t everyone?</p>
<p>But what about Boston&#8217;s win after a longer layoff than the Wings vs a team that must have had THE ultimate high winning with two goals in the last two minutes in the seventh game on the road against Martin Brodeur?</p>
<p>So far 100% of teams who had long layoffs after the first round have won the first game of the next vs teams that didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>You were right. Detroit got the only stat that matters. &#8220;W&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While they did just squeak by the Ducks in game 1, if you refer back to the article Rich posted the other day about layoffs and how teams with long layoffs usually lose game 1, then perhaps just barely winning isn&#039;t so bad.

My feeling is Anaheim was coming off the high of 1st round victory and hand the momentum whereas the Wings had been waiting for a week for an opponent.

As I think we&#039;ve both indicated it will be a close series but I still feel the Wings will be victorious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While they did just squeak by the Ducks in game 1, if you refer back to the article Rich posted the other day about layoffs and how teams with long layoffs usually lose game 1, then perhaps just barely winning isn&#8217;t so bad.</p>
<p>My feeling is Anaheim was coming off the high of 1st round victory and hand the momentum whereas the Wings had been waiting for a week for an opponent.</p>
<p>As I think we&#8217;ve both indicated it will be a close series but I still feel the Wings will be victorious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1500</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canucks, yes. Wings, I don&#039;t think so. 

Squeaked it out in Game 1. But JUST. Should be dominating at home with that lineup.

And that BRUTAL 5 and a game bonehead call.

I sure hope THAT isn&#039;t the one thing the series will turn on. That would be a disgrace.

But even with that in their favour, the Wings just squeaked it out. That&#039;s two squeakers in a row. Not a good sign for the mighty Wings, I&#039;m thinking. But, WSS, TWWW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canucks, yes. Wings, I don&#8217;t think so. </p>
<p>Squeaked it out in Game 1. But JUST. Should be dominating at home with that lineup.</p>
<p>And that BRUTAL 5 and a game bonehead call.</p>
<p>I sure hope THAT isn&#8217;t the one thing the series will turn on. That would be a disgrace.</p>
<p>But even with that in their favour, the Wings just squeaked it out. That&#8217;s two squeakers in a row. Not a good sign for the mighty Wings, I&#8217;m thinking. But, WSS, TWWW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1498</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob,

A comment almost as in-depth as my analysis.  I agree with your points and although I feel the Wings will win the series I too could very easily see the Ducks taking it.

Luckily the Captain was &quot;on fire&quot; tonight and led the boys to a Game 1 Victory.

I still see a Canucks/Wings Conference Final.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>A comment almost as in-depth as my analysis.  I agree with your points and although I feel the Wings will win the series I too could very easily see the Ducks taking it.</p>
<p>Luckily the Captain was &#8220;on fire&#8221; tonight and led the boys to a Game 1 Victory.</p>
<p>I still see a Canucks/Wings Conference Final.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Osgood&#039;s talking a good game. 

His team rolled over a CBJ team who, let&#039;s face it, were challenged on O, reasonable on D, had a good coach and insane fans and were one of the best poster teams for &quot;WE MADE IT TO THE PLAYOFFS&quot; I&#039;ve ever seen. Next year for them if they keep Nash and Brassard returns to form and Mason doesn&#039;t do a Price.

BUT, they did play hard in game four and score how many goals on Osgood and Lidstrom and Rafalski and Stuart and Datsyuk? And lost it in the last minute going into OT on a Wing PP?

If that team can make the Wings look like that in a fourth game, up 3 games to none...

And no Rafalski (shoulder it looked like to me). And Lidstrom&#039;s one of the best of all time, but he looks &quot;off&quot; to me. Nothing I can put my finger on, but...

And a PP roaring at what, 40%? And Datsyuk has what, 2 points?

Oh, there&#039;s lots of others there. Hossa, for example. How many hits can his knee take, do you think? Looks from the way he&#039;s skating he might&#039;ve tweaked the old groin, too.

Detroit just looks tired to me.

And the Ducks are just skating and skating. And that 27 -- looks like he wants to go out with a Cup and a gold medal, doesn&#039;t it? And who&#039;s got a book on that Hiller? Who is that guy anyway?

But still, I think this is one of those series that&#039;ll turn on one thing. Maybe a goal from centre ice, or a big hit, or a 1 - 0 game. A fight? Perish the thought! But something like that.

And because it feels like that kind of series to me, I won&#039;t be even a tiny bit surprised if the Wings take it in 4 or 5, or even in the third overtime of the seventh game.

But I&#039;m going to say the Ducks in 6 or 7, maybe in 5 if I&#039;m right about the Wings. Go figure, eh?

WSS. TWWW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osgood&#8217;s talking a good game. </p>
<p>His team rolled over a CBJ team who, let&#8217;s face it, were challenged on O, reasonable on D, had a good coach and insane fans and were one of the best poster teams for &#8220;WE MADE IT TO THE PLAYOFFS&#8221; I&#8217;ve ever seen. Next year for them if they keep Nash and Brassard returns to form and Mason doesn&#8217;t do a Price.</p>
<p>BUT, they did play hard in game four and score how many goals on Osgood and Lidstrom and Rafalski and Stuart and Datsyuk? And lost it in the last minute going into OT on a Wing PP?</p>
<p>If that team can make the Wings look like that in a fourth game, up 3 games to none&#8230;</p>
<p>And no Rafalski (shoulder it looked like to me). And Lidstrom&#8217;s one of the best of all time, but he looks &#8220;off&#8221; to me. Nothing I can put my finger on, but&#8230;</p>
<p>And a PP roaring at what, 40%? And Datsyuk has what, 2 points?</p>
<p>Oh, there&#8217;s lots of others there. Hossa, for example. How many hits can his knee take, do you think? Looks from the way he&#8217;s skating he might&#8217;ve tweaked the old groin, too.</p>
<p>Detroit just looks tired to me.</p>
<p>And the Ducks are just skating and skating. And that 27 &#8212; looks like he wants to go out with a Cup and a gold medal, doesn&#8217;t it? And who&#8217;s got a book on that Hiller? Who is that guy anyway?</p>
<p>But still, I think this is one of those series that&#8217;ll turn on one thing. Maybe a goal from centre ice, or a big hit, or a 1 &#8211; 0 game. A fight? Perish the thought! But something like that.</p>
<p>And because it feels like that kind of series to me, I won&#8217;t be even a tiny bit surprised if the Wings take it in 4 or 5, or even in the third overtime of the seventh game.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m going to say the Ducks in 6 or 7, maybe in 5 if I&#8217;m right about the Wings. Go figure, eh?</p>
<p>WSS. TWWW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking down the Ducks and Wings &#124; Crash the Crease</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1477</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking down the Ducks and Wings &#124; Crash the Crease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=11471#comment-1477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://www.illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/" rel="nofollow">http://www.illegalcurve.com/2009/04/29/detroit-red-wings-anaheim-ducks-2nd-round-playoff-preview/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
