<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vancouver Canucks – St. Louis Blues Playoff Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/vancouver-canucks-%E2%80%93-st-louis-blues-playoff-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/vancouver-canucks-%e2%80%93-st-louis-blues-playoff-preview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vancouver-canucks-%25e2%2580%2593-st-louis-blues-playoff-preview</link>
	<description>The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/vancouver-canucks-%e2%80%93-st-louis-blues-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10622#comment-1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luongo&#039;s rested and on a roll -- no doubt. All world, no doubt.

Mason&#039;s unproven, but I think &quot;his&quot; bad start was more his team&#039;s bad start than anything else. Even Luongo has to have a team playing well in front of him.

The edge in goal goes to the Canucks, yes; but not as much as you&#039;d think just looking at it &quot;on paper&quot;. As everyone keeps saying, the Blues&#039;ve been playing playoff hockey for a long while now, and they&#039;ve been doing it very well.

On D I think there&#039;re health concerns with Salo and Bieksa, but the edge goes to Vancouver, no doubt. I&#039;m glad you mentioned Jackman because I think he&#039;s an example of an average player with a bit of a nasty edge who&#039;s been thrust into a leading role by circumstance and has reached a level I never would have thought he could reach. I&#039;d compare him now with a Jason Smith or a Francois Beauchemin in their Cup runs when it comes to his overall playing level and his importance to the team.

I think that Canuck fans should be concerned about their forwards because Demitra&#039;s wonky groin (or is it knee? or both?)is always just a tweak away from missing a series, Sundin just hasn&#039;t shown he has it (though he may step it up for the playoffs) and Kessler&#039;s had a monster season but he can&#039;t carry the second line by himself. The Sedins and Burrows are top notch, yes; but in the playoffs where the physical intensity and the checking go up exponentially, if they could be shut down the strain on the second line could be a huge factor.

On the other hand -- yes, I have to say it again -- the Blues up front remind me so much of the young Oilers of the 80&#039;s it&#039;s unreal. They don&#039;t know how good they are yet and they&#039;re so full of energy and youth they just haven&#039;t seemed to care who they face. 

I remember so well watching a Monday afternoon game where they just would not quit against the Bruins in Boston until they completed a huge comeback and won it. And there was another one in Detroit where they just HAD to win and they didn&#039;t quit until they did. I told the TV screen, &quot;Look out for these guys.&quot; after the winner went in against Boston and &quot;I told you so.&quot; after the game in Detroit. (You can&#039;t tell the guys I watch the games with anything, they think they know it all. Fools. Besides, the TV has some great insights.) I give the Blues the edge up front.

Coaching: Blues. Vigneault&#039;s good, but...

Prediction: Blues in 6. &quot;Here we go Blues, here we go...&quot;

(And oh what a season the Blues could have next year...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luongo&#8217;s rested and on a roll &#8212; no doubt. All world, no doubt.</p>
<p>Mason&#8217;s unproven, but I think &#8220;his&#8221; bad start was more his team&#8217;s bad start than anything else. Even Luongo has to have a team playing well in front of him.</p>
<p>The edge in goal goes to the Canucks, yes; but not as much as you&#8217;d think just looking at it &#8220;on paper&#8221;. As everyone keeps saying, the Blues&#8217;ve been playing playoff hockey for a long while now, and they&#8217;ve been doing it very well.</p>
<p>On D I think there&#8217;re health concerns with Salo and Bieksa, but the edge goes to Vancouver, no doubt. I&#8217;m glad you mentioned Jackman because I think he&#8217;s an example of an average player with a bit of a nasty edge who&#8217;s been thrust into a leading role by circumstance and has reached a level I never would have thought he could reach. I&#8217;d compare him now with a Jason Smith or a Francois Beauchemin in their Cup runs when it comes to his overall playing level and his importance to the team.</p>
<p>I think that Canuck fans should be concerned about their forwards because Demitra&#8217;s wonky groin (or is it knee? or both?)is always just a tweak away from missing a series, Sundin just hasn&#8217;t shown he has it (though he may step it up for the playoffs) and Kessler&#8217;s had a monster season but he can&#8217;t carry the second line by himself. The Sedins and Burrows are top notch, yes; but in the playoffs where the physical intensity and the checking go up exponentially, if they could be shut down the strain on the second line could be a huge factor.</p>
<p>On the other hand &#8212; yes, I have to say it again &#8212; the Blues up front remind me so much of the young Oilers of the 80&#8242;s it&#8217;s unreal. They don&#8217;t know how good they are yet and they&#8217;re so full of energy and youth they just haven&#8217;t seemed to care who they face. </p>
<p>I remember so well watching a Monday afternoon game where they just would not quit against the Bruins in Boston until they completed a huge comeback and won it. And there was another one in Detroit where they just HAD to win and they didn&#8217;t quit until they did. I told the TV screen, &#8220;Look out for these guys.&#8221; after the winner went in against Boston and &#8220;I told you so.&#8221; after the game in Detroit. (You can&#8217;t tell the guys I watch the games with anything, they think they know it all. Fools. Besides, the TV has some great insights.) I give the Blues the edge up front.</p>
<p>Coaching: Blues. Vigneault&#8217;s good, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Prediction: Blues in 6. &#8220;Here we go Blues, here we go&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>(And oh what a season the Blues could have next year&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
