<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey Devils- Carolina Hurricanes Playoff Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/new-jersey-devils-carolina-hurricanes-playoff-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/new-jersey-devils-carolina-hurricanes-playoff-preview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-jersey-devils-carolina-hurricanes-playoff-preview</link>
	<description>The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/new-jersey-devils-carolina-hurricanes-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1349</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10617#comment-1349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty hard to dispute any of your points, but...

Don&#039;t you get a feeling of &quot;disfunctionalness&quot; from the Devils? Just now created that term (should probably copyright it but at least it doesn&#039;t matter how it&#039;s spelled)), but to use a great term (I have permission to use this): I think that NJ is going to have a craptacular series and crash and burn. It wouldn&#039;t surprise me to see them play their final two games at home this year in the first two games of the series.

I guess it boils down to the feeling that they SHOULD win, certainly on paper. But the Canes have done the opposite of the Devils. While NJ&#039;s been disfunctionalizing, Carolina&#039;s been gelling.

Interestingly enough, what makes me think I just might be right when I say Canes in 5 (maybe even 4 but not more than 6) is that as well-constructed and well thought-out and very compelling as your arguments are I get the distinct feeling that you&#039;re trying to convince yourself as much as the IC readers. Otherwise you just wouldn&#039;t be so darn reasonable about a team and a series you care very passionately about.

I get the sense you&#039;re thinking, &quot;Yes, those Canes are good but the Devils will do it. It might take seven, but I won&#039;t be disappointed. Really.&quot;

Been wrong many a time, and will be many more. But not this time, I think. However...

&quot;We shall see. That&#039;s why we watch.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty hard to dispute any of your points, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you get a feeling of &#8220;disfunctionalness&#8221; from the Devils? Just now created that term (should probably copyright it but at least it doesn&#8217;t matter how it&#8217;s spelled)), but to use a great term (I have permission to use this): I think that NJ is going to have a craptacular series and crash and burn. It wouldn&#8217;t surprise me to see them play their final two games at home this year in the first two games of the series.</p>
<p>I guess it boils down to the feeling that they SHOULD win, certainly on paper. But the Canes have done the opposite of the Devils. While NJ&#8217;s been disfunctionalizing, Carolina&#8217;s been gelling.</p>
<p>Interestingly enough, what makes me think I just might be right when I say Canes in 5 (maybe even 4 but not more than 6) is that as well-constructed and well thought-out and very compelling as your arguments are I get the distinct feeling that you&#8217;re trying to convince yourself as much as the IC readers. Otherwise you just wouldn&#8217;t be so darn reasonable about a team and a series you care very passionately about.</p>
<p>I get the sense you&#8217;re thinking, &#8220;Yes, those Canes are good but the Devils will do it. It might take seven, but I won&#8217;t be disappointed. Really.&#8221;</p>
<p>Been wrong many a time, and will be many more. But not this time, I think. However&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;We shall see. That&#8217;s why we watch.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
