<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston Bruins-Montreal Canadiens Playoff Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/boston-bruins-montreal-canadiens-playoff-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/boston-bruins-montreal-canadiens-playoff-preview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=boston-bruins-montreal-canadiens-playoff-preview</link>
	<description>The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 04:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/13/boston-bruins-montreal-canadiens-playoff-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10593#comment-1332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Krejci is feeling the long season and has faded somewhat, or he might be hurting. He&#039;s lost the quickness in his moves, and I think his teammates are covering for him. A couple of times in the past week or two he&#039;s taken a dubious-quality hit and Chara, Thornton and Co. have jumped in VERY fast. That makes me think &quot;hurting&quot; when combined with his lower production and the sense that there&#039;ve been lots of hits like that before and no one&#039;s jumped in THAT fast. 

On the other hand Bergeron has really started to show some energy and the touch and playmaking he had before the concussions, so that&#039;s a plus. There&#039;s my second choice for the Masterton, Sullivan being my first.

You are so right about Kovalev -- look in the dictionary under enigma and there he is. If he plays like he can, he can make this series a pick&#039;em. 

I think Recchi&#039;s the X-factor. His maturity and experience combined with that PP savvy equals the Bruin balance-tipper in the series. Also if Lucic brings it like he can, the Habs have no answer for him. 

Schneider can make up (almost, perhaps) for the loss of Markov on the PP, but no one they have can anchor the D in their own end like Markov. Big factor.

Overall on D, though, it&#039;s Boston all the way. Chara&#039;s a horse who scores big ones on the PP. Wideman&#039;s quietly become a threat on the PP and a force in his own end. Hunwick and Montador can play effectively up front, too.

And Savard and Kessel and Ryder and Wheeler...

As for Thomas: he&#039;s an inspiration to his team and seems to rise to the occasion as required, but Price has the pure ability of a Roy.
If he gets his swagger back (and we saw some of it before his team let him down yet again on Saturday night vs. Pittsburgh), look out. Big IF, I know, but I never count out an 8th seed with weapons like the Habs have.

For what it&#039;s worth I like Rask over Fernandez, but unless Manny&#039;s wonky back slips out, we won&#039;t even see Tuukka on the bench. If he was there, though, I&#039;d like the Bruins chances even better.

BUT -- all that having been said: those Habs give me a hinky feeling -- I never count them out.

SO: (deep breath) Bruins in five (maybe four if they start to roll), but if it goes seven: Habs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Krejci is feeling the long season and has faded somewhat, or he might be hurting. He&#8217;s lost the quickness in his moves, and I think his teammates are covering for him. A couple of times in the past week or two he&#8217;s taken a dubious-quality hit and Chara, Thornton and Co. have jumped in VERY fast. That makes me think &#8220;hurting&#8221; when combined with his lower production and the sense that there&#8217;ve been lots of hits like that before and no one&#8217;s jumped in THAT fast. </p>
<p>On the other hand Bergeron has really started to show some energy and the touch and playmaking he had before the concussions, so that&#8217;s a plus. There&#8217;s my second choice for the Masterton, Sullivan being my first.</p>
<p>You are so right about Kovalev &#8212; look in the dictionary under enigma and there he is. If he plays like he can, he can make this series a pick&#8217;em. </p>
<p>I think Recchi&#8217;s the X-factor. His maturity and experience combined with that PP savvy equals the Bruin balance-tipper in the series. Also if Lucic brings it like he can, the Habs have no answer for him. </p>
<p>Schneider can make up (almost, perhaps) for the loss of Markov on the PP, but no one they have can anchor the D in their own end like Markov. Big factor.</p>
<p>Overall on D, though, it&#8217;s Boston all the way. Chara&#8217;s a horse who scores big ones on the PP. Wideman&#8217;s quietly become a threat on the PP and a force in his own end. Hunwick and Montador can play effectively up front, too.</p>
<p>And Savard and Kessel and Ryder and Wheeler&#8230;</p>
<p>As for Thomas: he&#8217;s an inspiration to his team and seems to rise to the occasion as required, but Price has the pure ability of a Roy.<br />
If he gets his swagger back (and we saw some of it before his team let him down yet again on Saturday night vs. Pittsburgh), look out. Big IF, I know, but I never count out an 8th seed with weapons like the Habs have.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth I like Rask over Fernandez, but unless Manny&#8217;s wonky back slips out, we won&#8217;t even see Tuukka on the bench. If he was there, though, I&#8217;d like the Bruins chances even better.</p>
<p>BUT &#8212; all that having been said: those Habs give me a hinky feeling &#8212; I never count them out.</p>
<p>SO: (deep breath) Bruins in five (maybe four if they start to roll), but if it goes seven: Habs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
