<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Favorites, Darkhorses, and Longshots: Who Are Your Best Bets?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets</link>
	<description>The Illegal Curve Hockey Show provides the most comprehensive coverage of the hockey world. 9AM CST Saturdays on Sports Radio 1290 Winnipeg. Podcast available after on iTunes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Calgary&#039;s D is too banged up to make a run.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Calgary&#8217;s D is too banged up to make a run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1265</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I push?? hehe

If they have a healthy 2nd and 3rd line then I think Calgary is deep and tough enough to make it.  If not then I would go with Pittsburgh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I push?? hehe</p>
<p>If they have a healthy 2nd and 3rd line then I think Calgary is deep and tough enough to make it.  If not then I would go with Pittsburgh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Car/Pit I&#039;ll go with Pit.

No ties for David either, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Car/Pit I&#8217;ll go with Pit.</p>
<p>No ties for David either, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Re: Det/SJ -- I don&#039;t think either of these teams will win the West which means they can&#039;t win the Cup (we are picking the Cup winner here, right?), but I don&#039;t think any of the other 3 &quot;Faves&quot; will either, so my answer has to be &quot;None of the above&quot; if the question is &quot;Who do you think is the best bet out of these four categories?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Det/SJ &#8212; I don&#8217;t think either of these teams will win the West which means they can&#8217;t win the Cup (we are picking the Cup winner here, right?), but I don&#8217;t think any of the other 3 &#8220;Faves&#8221; will either, so my answer has to be &#8220;None of the above&#8221; if the question is &#8220;Who do you think is the best bet out of these four categories?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goon</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>goon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wild aren&#039;t even going to make it and I would take the Devils off the favorites list because they have played horrible as of late.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wild aren&#8217;t even going to make it and I would take the Devils off the favorites list because they have played horrible as of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No gurantees of course.  But the stat seems to indicate that for the past ten years the teams in cruise control, winning 5 or 6 of the last 10 in a season stand a good chance to win the Cup.  Does this mean that the Canes can&#039;t win, of course not.  Although Ward might be feeling some fatigue having played like 30 games in a row.

If forced to pick I&#039;d say;

Favorites:  Detroit
2nd Tier: Calgary or Pittsburgh
Avoid: Anaheim
Longshots:  St. Louis]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No gurantees of course.  But the stat seems to indicate that for the past ten years the teams in cruise control, winning 5 or 6 of the last 10 in a season stand a good chance to win the Cup.  Does this mean that the Canes can&#8217;t win, of course not.  Although Ward might be feeling some fatigue having played like 30 games in a row.</p>
<p>If forced to pick I&#8217;d say;</p>
<p>Favorites:  Detroit<br />
2nd Tier: Calgary or Pittsburgh<br />
Avoid: Anaheim<br />
Longshots:  St. Louis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1258</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David,

Do you think those numbers are significant?  I don&#039;t know?
The best teams in the league may have already clinched their division/playoff position, and are easing up as they heal and get ready for the post-season.

I don&#039;t think the Canes&#039; strong play will be a detriment going into the post-season, but it may not have that much of a strong effect.

Bob,

Come on - no ties - especially between Detroit and San Jose.  Who would win that potential Conference finals match-up?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Do you think those numbers are significant?  I don&#8217;t know?<br />
The best teams in the league may have already clinched their division/playoff position, and are easing up as they heal and get ready for the post-season.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Canes&#8217; strong play will be a detriment going into the post-season, but it may not have that much of a strong effect.</p>
<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Come on &#8211; no ties &#8211; especially between Detroit and San Jose.  Who would win that potential Conference finals match-up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Roberts</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faves -- Det/SJ (tie)

2nd Tier -- Car/Pit (tie)

Avoid  -- Ana

Longshots -- StL

Best bet -- meaning who&#039;s most likely to win the Cup? -- Det/SJ.

But I don&#039;t think either of those two will, even though they&#039;re the faves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Faves &#8212; Det/SJ (tie)</p>
<p>2nd Tier &#8212; Car/Pit (tie)</p>
<p>Avoid  &#8212; Ana</p>
<p>Longshots &#8212; StL</p>
<p>Best bet &#8212; meaning who&#8217;s most likely to win the Cup? &#8212; Det/SJ.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t think either of those two will, even though they&#8217;re the faves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 20:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as of right now;

East:
Boston - 70%
Washington - 60%
New Jersey - 30%
Philadelphia - 60%
Carolina - 90%
Pittsburgh - 70%
Montreal - 50%
NYR - 50%

West:
San Jose - 70%
Detroit - 60%
Calgary - 40%
Chicago - 70%
Vancouver - 50%
Columbus - 50%
Anaheim - 80%
St. Louis - 70%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So as of right now;</p>
<p>East:<br />
Boston &#8211; 70%<br />
Washington &#8211; 60%<br />
New Jersey &#8211; 30%<br />
Philadelphia &#8211; 60%<br />
Carolina &#8211; 90%<br />
Pittsburgh &#8211; 70%<br />
Montreal &#8211; 50%<br />
NYR &#8211; 50%</p>
<p>West:<br />
San Jose &#8211; 70%<br />
Detroit &#8211; 60%<br />
Calgary &#8211; 40%<br />
Chicago &#8211; 70%<br />
Vancouver &#8211; 50%<br />
Columbus &#8211; 50%<br />
Anaheim &#8211; 80%<br />
St. Louis &#8211; 70%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://illegalcurve.com/2009/04/09/favorites-darkhorses-and-longshots-who-are-the-best-bets/comment-page-1/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.illegalcurve.com/?p=10206#comment-1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only thing going against the Canes might be their momentum.  Last ten years of Stanley Cup Winners and their play over the last 10 games heading into the playoffs.

Team                       &#124; WN% - Last 10 &#124; WN%-Season &#124; Difference

1997-98 Red Wings   &#124; 60%                &#124; 54%              &#124; +6%

2007-08 Red Wings   &#124; 70%                &#124; 66%              &#124; +4%

1998-99 Stars          &#124; 60%                 &#124; 62%              &#124; -2%

2000-01 Avalanche   &#124; 60%                 &#124; 63%              &#124; -3%

1999-00 Devils         &#124; 50%                 &#124; 55%              &#124; -5%

2003-04 Lightning     &#124; 50%                 &#124; 56%              &#124; -6%

2006-07 Ducks         &#124; 50%                 &#124; 59%              &#124; -9%

2005-06 Hurricanes   &#124; 50%                 &#124; 63%              &#124; -13%

2002-03 Devils          &#124; 40%                 &#124; 56%              &#124; -16%

2001-02 Red Wings    &#124; 10%                 &#124; 62%              &#124; -52%

Average                    &#124; 50%                 &#124; 58%              &#124; -8%]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only thing going against the Canes might be their momentum.  Last ten years of Stanley Cup Winners and their play over the last 10 games heading into the playoffs.</p>
<p>Team                       | WN% &#8211; Last 10 | WN%-Season | Difference</p>
<p>1997-98 Red Wings   | 60%                | 54%              | +6%</p>
<p>2007-08 Red Wings   | 70%                | 66%              | +4%</p>
<p>1998-99 Stars          | 60%                 | 62%              | -2%</p>
<p>2000-01 Avalanche   | 60%                 | 63%              | -3%</p>
<p>1999-00 Devils         | 50%                 | 55%              | -5%</p>
<p>2003-04 Lightning     | 50%                 | 56%              | -6%</p>
<p>2006-07 Ducks         | 50%                 | 59%              | -9%</p>
<p>2005-06 Hurricanes   | 50%                 | 63%              | -13%</p>
<p>2002-03 Devils          | 40%                 | 56%              | -16%</p>
<p>2001-02 Red Wings    | 10%                 | 62%              | -52%</p>
<p>Average                    | 50%                 | 58%              | -8%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
